Study Family Identity Auditor
Audit declared paper-to-study families for repeated DOI assignments, registry conflicts and unassigned reports without inferring independent evidence.
Loading tool…
How to use Study Family Identity Auditor
Two papers can describe one study, and one DOI cannot establish independent evidence. Review explicit identity labels before counting studies or synthesizing findings.
- Enter bibliographic identifiers and reviewed study-family labels.
- Inspect conflicting DOI/registry assignments before counting evidence.
- Confirm identities in original sources; no clinical, truth or quality judgment is made.
Good to know
- No identifier is fetched or verified to resolve.
- Several reports or citations do not prove independent evidence or a clinical effect.
- Independent local review of supplied records. No account/API access, AI, publication, outreach, source-truth verification, legal certification or income forecast.
- Each field is limited to 8,000 UTF-16 characters and each CSV to 100 data rows with the exact displayed header. Quoted commas/newlines and doubled quotes are accepted. Unsupported controls, unpaired surrogates, duplicate identities and invalid records are refused rather than silently removed. Ordinary decimal inputs have magnitude at most 999,999,999; the smallest supported nonzero magnitude is 0.000000001. Exponents are refused; whole counts use exact integer checks before numeric conversion. Results use exact rational arithmetic, with at most 18 decimal digits and an ellipsis when further fractional digits remain.
- Markdown and CSV are editable review exports. CSV retains unresolved records and apostrophe-prefixes spreadsheet-like formula text; review your real import settings. Tool outputs can contain your entered pseudonymous records, so inspect them before sharing.
- Independent deterministic ToolJovia workflow. Inputs stay in this browser. No vendor account, model call, upload, publication, outreach, payment, saved input or outside service is used. A local reconciliation does not validate source truth, customers, income or legal compliance.
Research behind this workbench
These cases explain the business mechanism. The workbench is ToolJovia's independent adaptation, not a claim about the company's internal workflow or an endorsement.
Common questions
Are several papers automatically several independent studies?
No. Study families are operator declarations, and independent study count is deliberately not determined. Verify original publications and study registrations.
Does a registry conflict prove an error?
No. Multiple registry labels may be legitimate. The audit flags the entered relationship for review and performs no online identifier resolution.
Keep going with related tools
All education →Bibliographic Identifier Workbench
Check ISBN-10, ISBN-13 and ISSN source shapes and check digits, with explicit 978 ISBN conversion evidence.
TextCitation Evidence Audit Workbench
Review claim-to-source records for missing evidence and literal excerpt coverage in supplied source text without presenting a fact-check score.
DataAsset LOD and Texture Budget Auditor
Audit declared per-asset LOD triangles and shared texture usage against explicit budgets, retaining missing resources and exact uncompressed mip estimates.
EducationStudy Selection Flow Reconciler
Reconcile explicit record duplicates and title/full-text screening decisions, keeping missing exclusion reasons and contradictory stages visible.